It is one of the most disputed topics in college sports. Should college
athletes be paid? No, athletes should not be paid in college.
If they are not satisfied, there should be a way for
athletes to go into a sports club or minor league system, where they could be
paid, and universities could give the education to those who truly care about
it. This also would give larger universities that bring in more money an unfair
scouting advantage of offering more money than those smaller schools who will
may only be able to offer a very small amount.
The fact that many
athletes are already on scholarships shows that they are already making more
than the common student. Most students don’t receive even one scholarship from
the school. Some students work every day just so they can eat, because they
don’t have enough money. These students may start to resent their athletic
peers should they be paid.
The NCAA has said that “if
college athletes were to start being paid, many schools would leave Division I
sports” (Ganim, par. 1). Furthermore, “the universities that stayed in Division
I sports would have to start cutting other, less popular sports to be able to
afford the salaries” (Ganim, par. 2). Many of the athletes would also be left
with nothing to do and may even be forced to transfer to another school to
continue moving on in their respective sports.
If athletes were to be
paid, then the game may seem to be more about money and greed, rather than the
love of playing the sport. Again Mark Emmert of the NCAA states “if amateurism
goes away, so will the games as we know them now” (Ganim, par. 8). He goes on
to mention that many schools lose money on the sports but they keep them for
social cohesion, most likely among students who love to watch their respective
teams play.
No comments:
Post a Comment